Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a generator fitted in a cabin on the deck of an imported vessel formed part of the ship so as not to require separate declaration under section 30 of the Customs Act, 1962, and whether its non-declaration justified confiscation.
Analysis: The generator was found by panchnama to be fitted in a specially made cabin on the deck of the vessel. On those facts, it was treated as an integral part of the ship and not as separately detachable movable spares or stores. Since fittings forming part of the vessel imported are not required to be separately declared, there was no misdeclaration or non-declaration warranting confiscation.
Conclusion: The generator was not separately dutiable or declarable as movable spares or stores, and the confiscation order was unsustainable.