Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount shown separately as excise duty in the invoices and collected from customers on clearance of exempted goods was recoverable under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, notwithstanding the assessee's reversal of credit under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The invoices specifically disclosed excise duty separately over and above the price of the goods. The amount collected was not merely part of the price but was recovered as duty from the customers. Since the goods in question were not liable to duty, any amount collected in the guise of excise duty attracted Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The treatment under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 did not negate the statutory liability arising from separate collection of duty.
Conclusion: The amount separately collected was recoverable under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the assessee's challenge failed.