<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 43 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1116</link>
    <description>Separate disclosure of excise duty in invoices and collection of that amount from customers on clearance of exempted goods attracted liability under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The amount was treated as duty recovered from buyers, not as part of the sale price, and the fact that credit had been reversed under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 did not remove the statutory obligation to pay over the separately collected sum. The conclusion recorded is that the amount was recoverable under Section 11D and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 43 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1116</link>
      <description>Separate disclosure of excise duty in invoices and collection of that amount from customers on clearance of exempted goods attracted liability under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The amount was treated as duty recovered from buyers, not as part of the sale price, and the fact that credit had been reversed under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 did not remove the statutory obligation to pay over the separately collected sum. The conclusion recorded is that the amount was recoverable under Section 11D and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>