Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2006 (2) TMI 300 - HC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Winding up order for Utkal Distributors Pvt. Ltd. settled amicably with appointment of Receiver The court ordered the winding up of Utkal Distributors Pvt. Ltd. and directed the Official Liquidator to appoint a Valuer for the company's assets. ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Winding up order for Utkal Distributors Pvt. Ltd. settled amicably with appointment of Receiver

                            The court ordered the winding up of Utkal Distributors Pvt. Ltd. and directed the Official Liquidator to appoint a Valuer for the company's assets. Subsequently, parties settled the matter amicably, leading to the appointment of an Amicus Curiae to assist in determining amounts payable to shareholders and creditors. The court directed the distribution of surplus amounts among shareholders as per a report submitted by Mr. Das. Mr. Das was appointed as a Receiver to oversee the distribution process, with instructions for completion within a month and return of title deeds by banks.




                            Issues:
                            1. Liquidation of three companies and distribution of assets.
                            2. Compromise applications filed by United Bank of India and Sri Ranjit Kishore Mohanty.
                            3. Appointment of Amicus Curiae and submission of report.
                            4. Distribution of surplus amount among shareholders.
                            5. Appointment of Receiver for asset distribution.

                            Issue 1: Liquidation of three companies and distribution of assets

                            The judgment addresses Company Act Cases related to three companies: Orient Weaving Pvt. Ltd., National Foundry and Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd., and Utkal Distributors Pvt. Ltd. After liquidation of two companies, their assets were sold, and the amounts realized were kept in fixed deposits. Utkal Distributors Pvt. Ltd. was found to be a sister concern, leading to its liquidation due to raised claims. The court ordered winding up of Utkal Distributors Pvt. Ltd. and directed the Official Liquidator to appoint a Valuer for the company's assets. Subsequently, parties agreed to amicably settle the matter, leading to the appointment of an Amicus Curiae to assist in determining amounts payable to shareholders and creditors.

                            Issue 2: Compromise applications filed by United Bank of India and Sri Ranjit Kishore Mohanty

                            Applications were filed seeking permission to compromise suits against the companies. The terms included payment by the Official Liquidator to the Bank in full satisfaction of dues, leading to the abandonment of claims. Another application sought compromise related to a different suit. However, the court was informed of additional claims by Paradip Port Trust and Government Departments against Utkal Distributors Pvt. Ltd., leading to its tagging with the proceedings. Eventually, the court directed the distribution of surplus amounts among shareholders as per a report submitted by Mr. Das.

                            Issue 3: Appointment of Amicus Curiae and submission of report

                            Upon appointment of Mr. Jagannath Das as Amicus Curiae, parties submitted relevant documents for examination. Mr. Das submitted a detailed report specifying dues payable to creditors and proposed payments to shareholders from the surplus amounts available from the liquidated companies. Parties agreed to the distribution suggested in the report, which was accepted by the court.

                            Issue 4: Distribution of surplus amount among shareholders

                            After considering the report by Mr. Das and the agreed distribution plan, the court found it just and equitable to distribute the surplus amount among existing shareholders. To facilitate this distribution, the court appointed Mr. Das as a Receiver to oversee the process. The court directed all parties to appear before Mr. Das for the apportionment of shares and distribution of amounts, with the requirement of executing indemnity bonds to refund any amount in case of disputes.

                            Issue 5: Appointment of Receiver for asset distribution

                            In light of the appointment of Mr. Das as Receiver, the court directed the liquidator to provide the surplus amount for distribution. Parties were instructed to hand over respective amounts to shareholders/parties as per the apportionment indicated in the report. The court emphasized the completion of the distribution process within a month and instructed banks to return title deeds to concerned parties. Additionally, a sum was allocated to Mr. Das for his services. Finally, the court disposed of all three cases with these directions and observations.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found