Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the benefit of exemption Notification No. 32/99-CE despite variance between the certificates regarding installed capacity, and whether the requirement of 25% increase in installed capacity was satisfied.
Analysis: The certificates issued by the Chartered Engineer and the Directorate of Industries were found to relate to different limiting factors in the manufacturing process, and the variance between them was explained by the flow chart and supporting material. The relevant test under the notification was an overall increase of 25% in installed capacity, not a requirement that each section of the unit individually increase by 25%. On either certificate, the increase exceeded the prescribed threshold.
Conclusion: The assessee satisfied the condition of increased installed capacity and was rightly granted the benefit of the exemption notification.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed, and the exemption granted to the assessee was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: For exemption notifications linked to expansion of installed capacity, the statutory condition is satisfied by an overall increase meeting the prescribed percentage, even if different certificates measure capacity with reference to different bottlenecks in the manufacturing process.