Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a winding up petition under section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 could proceed when a reference under sections 15 and 16 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 was pending and the bar under section 22 of that Act operated.
Analysis: The pending reference before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction attracted the statutory embargo under section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. In view of that bar, the Court held that it could not proceed with the winding up petition at that stage. The proper course was for the creditor to participate in the proceedings before the Board and await the outcome of the reference, with liberty to pursue remedies in accordance with law depending on how the reference was decided.
Conclusion: The winding up petition was not maintainable during the pendency of the reference and was disposed of accordingly, with directions for expeditious disposal of the reference by the Board.
Final Conclusion: The statutory protection under the sick industrial company regime prevailed over the winding up request, leaving the creditor to pursue its remedy before the specialised forum until the reference was decided.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a reference under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 is pending, section 22 operates as a bar to winding up proceedings and the creditor must seek relief in the pending sick company process.