<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 261 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111058</link>
    <description>A pending reference before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction triggered the statutory bar under section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, preventing a winding up petition under section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 from proceeding at that stage. The creditor was required to participate in the sick company proceedings and await the outcome of the reference, with any further remedy to depend on how that reference was decided. The winding up petition was therefore not maintainable during the pendency of the reference, and the matter was disposed of with directions for expeditious consideration by the Board.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:12:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 261 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111058</link>
      <description>A pending reference before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction triggered the statutory bar under section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, preventing a winding up petition under section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 from proceeding at that stage. The creditor was required to participate in the sick company proceedings and await the outcome of the reference, with any further remedy to depend on how that reference was decided. The winding up petition was therefore not maintainable during the pendency of the reference, and the matter was disposed of with directions for expeditious consideration by the Board.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>