Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported motor car was liable to confiscation on the ground of alleged violation of the import conditions and absence of a valid import licence and release advice.
Analysis: The import documents showed that the licence number was furnished with the Bill of Entry and that the delay in shipment had been condoned by the DGFT. Correspondence from the DGFT and the Customs authorities also showed that the licence and release advice were traceable to the import in question. In these circumstances, the Department could not reject the importer's claim merely on the basis that the original documents were not in its possession, and any doubt ought to have been verified from the licensing authority or the counterpart Customs office.
Conclusion: The car was held not liable to confiscation. The confiscation was set aside and the matter was remanded for release of the car on payment of appropriate duty, with liberty to raise depreciation before the assessing authority.