Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent-company was liable to be wound up for failure to pay an admitted debt after service of statutory notice under the Companies Act, 1956.
Analysis: The petition was founded on a settled liability for payment of a specified sum with interest, and the record showed repeated demands and requests for time by the company. The company's later affidavit expressly ed the liability, and the amount remained unpaid despite service of notice under section 433(e) read with section 434(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956. In such circumstances, neglect to pay after statutory notice gave rise to the presumption of inability to pay debts, and the company was liable to be wound up.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent-company; the winding-up order was warranted.