Appellate Tribunal allows appeal, deems inkjet printer as capital goods under Rule 57Q. The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, setting aside the impugned order. The inkjet printer used by the appellant for printing ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellate Tribunal allows appeal, deems inkjet printer as capital goods under Rule 57Q.
The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, setting aside the impugned order. The inkjet printer used by the appellant for printing on beverage bottles was deemed capital goods under Rule 57Q.
The judgment by Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai states that the inkjet printer used by the appellant to print the date of manufacture and sale price on beverage bottles is considered capital goods under Rule 57Q. The appeal was allowed and the impugned order was set aside.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.