https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110340 The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, setting aside the impugned order. The inkjet printer used by the appellant for printing on beverage bottles was deemed capital goods under Rule 57Q. en-us Fri, 17 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:29:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110340 The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, setting aside the impugned order. The inkjet printer used by the appellant for printing on beverage bottles was deemed capital goods under Rule 57Q. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110340