Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2005 (3) TMI 475 - HC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court Sanctions Amalgamation Scheme under Companies Act, 1956. Shareholders and Creditors Approve. Assets Transferred, Companies Dissolved. The Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, proposed by five companies, transferring all ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Court Sanctions Amalgamation Scheme under Companies Act, 1956. Shareholders and Creditors Approve. Assets Transferred, Companies Dissolved.

                            The Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, proposed by five companies, transferring all properties, rights, claims, and liabilities of the Transferor Companies to the Transferee Company. Compliance with statutory requirements was confirmed, and the financial and legal status of the companies were disclosed. Shareholders and creditors' approvals were obtained, and reports from the Official Liquidator and Regional Director were positive. An extension until March 31, 2005, for sanctioning the Scheme was accepted. The Court directed the transfer of assets and dissolution of the Transferor Companies without winding up, with filing requirements specified.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
                            2. Sanction of the Scheme by the Court.
                            3. Compliance with statutory requirements and directions.
                            4. Financial and legal status of the involved companies.
                            5. Approval from shareholders and creditors.
                            6. Reports from the Official Liquidator and Regional Director.
                            7. Extension of the period for sanctioning the Scheme.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956:
                            The petition was filed by five companies seeking the Court's sanction for a Scheme of Amalgamation. The Transferor Companies were Rohit Soaps & Detergents Private Limited, Rahul Detergents Private Limited, Singh Detergents Private Limited, and Kanpur Detergents and Chemicals Private Limited. The Transferee Company was Shri Mahadeo Soap Industries Private Limited. The Scheme proposed the transfer of all properties, rights, claims, and liabilities of the Transferor Companies to the Transferee Company.

                            2. Sanction of the Scheme by the Court:
                            The petitioners requested the Court to sanction the Scheme of Amalgamation to be binding from April 1, 2003, or another date as fixed by the Court. The Court was satisfied with the disclosures made by the petitioners and found no objections filed against the Scheme. The Court sanctioned the Scheme under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.

                            3. Compliance with statutory requirements and directions:
                            The petitioners complied with the statutory requirements, including the preparation and auditing of financial accounts, maintaining proper books of account, and holding meetings of unsecured creditors as directed by the Court. The meetings were held on March 20, 2004, and the resolutions approving the Scheme were unanimously passed.

                            4. Financial and legal status of the involved companies:
                            The financial positions of the Transferor Companies and the Transferee Company as of March 31, 2003, were disclosed. The Court noted that there were no substantial changes in their financial positions since then, except those arising from the usual course of business. The petitioners also confirmed that no proceedings under sections 235 to 251 or sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, were pending against them.

                            5. Approval from shareholders and creditors:
                            The Court dispensed with the requirement of holding meetings of equity shareholders and secured creditors, as they had already approved the Scheme. The meetings of unsecured creditors were held as per the Court's directions, and the resolutions approving the Scheme were passed unanimously.

                            6. Reports from the Official Liquidator and Regional Director:
                            The Official Liquidator's report stated that the affairs of the Transferor Companies were not conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of members or the public. The Regional Director's affidavit confirmed that all employees of the Transferor Companies would become employees of the Transferee Company without interruption in service. The Regional Director also noted the extension of the period for sanctioning the Scheme until March 31, 2005.

                            7. Extension of the period for sanctioning the Scheme:
                            The Scheme initially provided for a revocation date of June 30, 2004, if not sanctioned by then. However, the Board of Directors of the Transferor and Transferee Companies extended this period to March 31, 2005. The Court accepted this extension, noting that the Board of Directors had the power to extend the period as per the Scheme's provisions.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation, directing that all properties, rights, interests, and liabilities of the Transferor Companies be transferred to the Transferee Company. The Transferor Companies were dissolved without winding up. The petitioners were directed to file a certified copy of the order with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days. The Company Petition was disposed of accordingly.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found