Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was admissible on channels, angles and threaded bars claimed as components or accessories of an electric overhead travelling crane proposed to be manufactured in the factory.
Analysis: Credit under Rule 57Q was available for capital goods and for existing components, spares, parts or accessories of such goods. Although a crane could qualify as capital goods, the goods in question were received before any crane existed in the factory. Since a component must form part of an existing machine, articles intended to become components in future could not be treated as components when received. The goods might have been inputs for manufacture of the crane and could have attracted credit under Rule 57A, but that was not the basis on which the claim was made.
Conclusion: Credit under Rule 57Q was not admissible and the claim failed.