Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent, being in possession of an asset belonging to a company in liquidation, could be directed to hand over the asset to the Official Liquidator.
Analysis: Upon winding up, the assets and effects of the company are deemed to be in the custody of the Court under section 456(2) of the Companies Act, 1956. The statement of affairs showed the scooter as a company asset in the respondent's possession. The respondent did not respond to the notice requiring surrender of the vehicle and did not dispute the material facts. In these circumstances, continued possession by the respondent was unauthorised and contrary to the obligations arising under the winding-up provisions and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.
Conclusion: The respondent was liable to deliver the scooter to the Official Liquidator and was rightly directed to do so within the time granted.
Ratio Decidendi: Property of a company in liquidation remains under the deemed custody of the Court, and any person in possession of such property must surrender it to the Official Liquidator when called upon to do so.