Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 10 of the Compulsory Deposit Scheme (Income-tax Payers) Act, 1974 was leviable when the assessee had filed a nil estimate and no direction had been issued for compulsory deposit.
Analysis: Liability to make a compulsory deposit under section 4 of the Compulsory Deposit Scheme (Income-tax Payers) Act, 1974 depends on the assessee's current income. Where the assessee had filed an estimate under section 209A(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 showing nil income, the current income, as considered by the Tribunal, was nil for the purpose of section 4(3)(b). In the absence of any direction by the Assessing Officer under section 6 of the Compulsory Deposit Scheme (Income-tax Payers) Act, 1974 requiring a deposit on the basis of the returned or assessed income, the foundation for invoking section 10 did not exist. The filing of a nil estimate also furnished reasonable cause against penal action.
Conclusion: The penalty was not exigible and its cancellation was ; the answer to the referred question is in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by upholding deletion of the penalty, as the statutory precondition for penal liability under the compulsory deposit scheme was not satisfied.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty for non-payment of compulsory deposit cannot be imposed unless the assessee is liable to make such deposit under the scheme, and a nil estimate filed under the income-tax return mechanism may negate that liability absent a further statutory direction.