Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2002 (10) TMI 714 - AT - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Customs duty upheld for Daughter Vessel; penalty reduced under Sections 114A and 112. The Tribunal upheld the demand for Customs duty, including the freight paid for the Daughter Vessel in the assessable value. The extended period of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Customs duty upheld for Daughter Vessel; penalty reduced under Sections 114A and 112.

                          The Tribunal upheld the demand for Customs duty, including the freight paid for the Daughter Vessel in the assessable value. The extended period of limitation was applied as the transport cost of the Daughter Vessel was not disclosed. The penalty under Section 114A was reduced to Rs. 1 crore, and the penalty under Section 112 was set aside.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Inclusion of freight paid for Daughter Vessel in the assessable value for Customs duty.
                          2. Time-barred nature of the demand for differential duty.
                          3. Imposition of penalties under Sections 114A and 112 of the Customs Act.
                          4. Chargeability of interest under Section 28AB of the Customs Act.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Inclusion of Freight Paid for Daughter Vessel in Assessable Value:
                          The primary issue is whether the freight paid for the deployment of the Daughter Vessel, which carried imported goods from Chennai/Vishakhapatnam Port to Haldia/Budge Budge Port, should be included in the assessable value for Customs duty. The Appellants argued that the run by the Daughter Vessel was a continuation of the Mother Vessel's journey and that the freight was already included in the assessable value. They cited various judicial decisions to support their claim that the Daughter Vessel's journey should be treated as a foreign run and a continuation of the Mother Vessel's journey. However, the Revenue contended that the total freight paid, including the Daughter Vessel's freight, should be included in the assessable value. The Tribunal agreed with the Revenue, stating that the total freight incurred for both vessels is the actual cost of transport from the foreign port to the place of importation, as per Rule 9(2) of the Customs Valuation Rules. The Tribunal upheld the demand for Customs duty, noting that the deployment of Daughter Vessels was a regular occurrence and not an extraordinary situation.

                          2. Time-barred Nature of the Demand for Differential Duty:
                          The Appellants contended that the demand for differential duty was time-barred as it fell beyond the period of six months. They argued that all primary facts were disclosed to the appropriate authority and there was no misrepresentation or willful suppression of facts. The Tribunal, however, agreed with the Revenue that the extended period of limitation was invokable as the fact of not including the transport cost of the Daughter Vessel was not disclosed to the Department. The Tribunal cited the Supreme Court's decision in the case of BPL India Ltd. v. CCE, Cochin, to support the invocation of the larger period of limitation.

                          3. Imposition of Penalties under Sections 114A and 112 of the Customs Act:
                          The Commissioner had imposed a penalty under Section 114A, equal to the amount of duty, and an additional penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs under Section 112 of the Customs Act. The Appellants argued that no penalty was imposable as there was no intention to evade duty. The Tribunal agreed that a penalty equal to the amount of duty under Section 114A was not warranted in this case. Instead, the Tribunal imposed a reduced penalty of Rs. 1 crore. The Tribunal also set aside the penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs imposed under Section 112.

                          4. Chargeability of Interest under Section 28AB of the Customs Act:
                          The Commissioner had also demanded interest under Section 28AB of the Customs Act. The Tribunal did not specifically address this issue in detail but upheld the demand for Customs duty and the imposition of a reduced penalty, implicitly supporting the chargeability of interest as per the provisions of the Act.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal upheld the demand for Customs duty, agreeing with the Revenue that the freight paid for the Daughter Vessel should be included in the assessable value. The extended period of limitation was deemed applicable due to non-disclosure of the Daughter Vessel's transport cost. The penalty under Section 114A was reduced to Rs. 1 crore, and the penalty under Section 112 was set aside. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found