<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 714 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109186</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for Customs duty, including the freight paid for the Daughter Vessel in the assessable value. The extended period of limitation was applied as the transport cost of the Daughter Vessel was not disclosed. The penalty under Section 114A was reduced to Rs. 1 crore, and the penalty under Section 112 was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:53:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 714 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109186</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for Customs duty, including the freight paid for the Daughter Vessel in the assessable value. The extended period of limitation was applied as the transport cost of the Daughter Vessel was not disclosed. The penalty under Section 114A was reduced to Rs. 1 crore, and the penalty under Section 112 was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>