Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2002 (11) TMI 682 - HC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Directors of M/s St. Mary's Finance Limited convicted for Companies Act violation. The court found the managing director and directors of M/s St. Mary's Finance Limited guilty of failing to furnish the statement of affairs as required ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Directors of M/s St. Mary's Finance Limited convicted for Companies Act violation.

                              The court found the managing director and directors of M/s St. Mary's Finance Limited guilty of failing to furnish the statement of affairs as required under section 454(5) of the Companies Act. Each accused was sentenced to two years of simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2 lakhs, with an additional six months of simple imprisonment in default of payment of the fine. The court emphasized the deliberate and fraudulent actions of the accused, which jeopardized the interests of thousands of depositors.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Whether the accused failed to furnish the statement of affairs without any reasonable excuse and had committed the offence under section 454(5) of the Companies Act.
                              2. If the accused are found guilty, what is the sentence to be imposedRs.

                              Detailed Analysis:

                              Issue 1: Failure to Furnish the Statement of Affairs
                              - Background: The Official Liquidator, appointed as the provisional liquidator of M/s St. Mary's Finance Limited, filed a criminal complaint against the managing director and directors of the company for failing to submit the statement of affairs within the statutory period of twenty-one days from the date of appointment.
                              - Allegations: It was alleged that the accused did not produce current records, registers, valuable securities, and other documents before the Official Liquidator. Despite repeated notices and demands, they failed to furnish the statement of affairs.
                              - Evidence: The Official Liquidator testified that the accused were bound to submit the statement of affairs but failed to do so. The first accused's request for an extension of time was rejected. The statement of affairs submitted later was incomplete and unacceptable as it did not contain all the details as prescribed by Section 454(1) of the Companies Act.
                              - Court's Findings: The court found that the accused wilfully abstained from producing genuine records and failed to file the proper statement of affairs. The first accused admitted to preparing registers just before producing them in court, which were found to be forged. The court noted that the accused violated orders and collected money from debtors, discharging liabilities selectively, which was in violation of the law and court orders.
                              - Conclusion: The court concluded that the accused failed to furnish the statement of affairs without any reasonable excuse and committed the offence under section 454(5) of the Companies Act.

                              Issue 2: Sentence to be Imposed
                              - Arguments for Leniency: The accused requested that the sentence be limited to a fine, arguing that they were not in possession of the necessary accounts to file the statement of affairs and that the complaint was filed by the provisional liquidator in his personal capacity.
                              - Court's Response: The court rejected these arguments, stating that the complaint was filed in the official capacity of the provisional liquidator. The court emphasized the gravity of the offence, noting the significant amount of money involved and the accused's deliberate actions to conceal records and obstruct justice.
                              - Sentence: Considering the seriousness of the offence and the accused's conduct, the court imposed the maximum sentence of two years imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2 lakhs each. In default of payment of the fine, the accused would undergo further simple imprisonment for six months each.

                              Judgment Summary:
                              The court found the managing director and directors of M/s St. Mary's Finance Limited guilty of failing to furnish the statement of affairs as required under section 454(5) of the Companies Act. The court sentenced each accused to two years of simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2 lakhs, with an additional six months of simple imprisonment in default of payment of the fine. The court highlighted the deliberate and fraudulent actions of the accused, which jeopardized the interests of thousands of depositors.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found