Employee unlawfully withholds company assets post-termination; court dismisses claims, advises legal representation.

The court held that the petitioner wrongfully withheld company assets after termination, rejecting his claims of disputed asset value and money owed. The court ruled that until the asset value is paid, the petitioner was unlawfully withholding assets. Despite the petitioner's argument that the matter was a civil dispute, the court found it necessary for Trial Court consideration, advising representation by a pleader. The petition was dismissed, and related applications closed, emphasizing the need for evidence to support a bona fide dispute between the parties.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether the petitioner wrongfully withheld assets of the company.
2. Whether the matter is purely a civil dispute or falls under section 630 of the Companies Act.

Analysis:

Issue 1:
The petitioner, a former director and Chief Executive Officer of the complainant company, was accused of wrongfully withholding company assets after his termination. The company demanded payment for assets valued at Rs. 8,00,450 through debit notes and legal notices, which the petitioner did not respond to. The petitioner disputed the value of assets and claimed the company owed him money, but the court held that lawful possession turns unlawful for non-payment. The respondent contended that until the asset value is paid, the petitioner is wrongfully withholding the assets.

Issue 2:
The petitioner argued that the dispute was a civil matter and not covered under section 630 of the Companies Act, citing a previous court decision. However, the court differentiated the present case from the precedent, stating that no evidence was presented to show a bona fide dispute between the parties. The court emphasized that the matter should be decided by the Trial Court after recording evidence, and it was premature to quash the proceedings at that stage. Despite the technical nature of the offense, the Trial Court was advised to consider allowing the petitioner representation by a pleader. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed, and related applications were closed.

---