Modvat credit for capital goods upheld where disputed items were used as parts of plant and machinery in manufacture.

The definition of capital goods under Modvat was applied in a wide and liberal manner, covering goods used for producing or processing final products as well as components, spare parts and accessories of such goods. As the disputed items were found to be parts of plant, machinery and equipment used in manufacture, and their use in production or processing of the final product was not controverted, they qualified for Modvat credit. The revenue challenge therefore failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the disputed items were eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods or parts/components used in the manufacture of the final product.

Analysis: The definition of capital goods was held to be wide and liberal. Goods used for producing or processing final products, and components, spare parts and accessories of such goods, were treated as eligible for Modvat credit. The finding that the items were used in production or processing of the final product was not controverted, and the items were found to be parts of plant, machinery and equipment used in manufacture.

Conclusion: The disputed items qualified for Modvat credit, and the revenue challenge failed.

---