Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an order permitting withdrawal of a winding up petition could stand after a winding up order had been passed and, in that context, whether the petition could be withdrawn without the consent of all creditors and contributories.
Analysis: Section 447 of the Companies Act, 1956 provides that an order for winding up operates in favour of all creditors and contributories as if made on a joint petition. On that footing, the character of the proceeding changes once a winding up order is made, and the petition is no longer maintainable as an individual proceeding capable of unilateral withdrawal by the petitioner. The objection that the court could not reconsider its earlier order was not accepted, and the earlier withdrawal order was treated as having been made without jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The order permitting withdrawal was recalled and the request to withdraw the petition was dismissed.
Final Conclusion: A winding up petition, after the making of a winding up order, cannot be withdrawn unilaterally by the petitioner, and an order allowing such withdrawal is liable to be set aside as without jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi: Upon a winding up order being made, the petition is treated as one for the benefit of all creditors and contributories, so unilateral withdrawal by the petitioner is impermissible without their consent.