Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal could succeed on a classification under Heading 1704.90 when the show cause notice had proposed only classification under Chapter Sub-heading 1701.90.
Analysis: The dispute before the lower authorities and in the notice was confined to the proposal that Candy Sugar should be classified under Chapter Sub-heading 1701.90. The notice did not propose classification under Heading 1704.90. A demand or appeal cannot travel beyond the scope of the show cause notice, and relief on a basis not put to notice is not sustainable.
Conclusion: The proposed classification under Heading 1704.90 could not be accepted, as it was beyond the show cause notice.