Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the final order required rectification to correctly state the exemption notifications applicable to goods classified under Chapter Heading 6803 during the relevant periods.
Analysis: The application pointed out that the earlier order had referred to Notification No. 08/96-C.E. in a manner suggesting its direct application to the disputed periods, although the duty periods were governed successively by Notification No. 5/97-C.E. and Notification No. 5/98-C.E. The order clarified that the duty demand had already been directed to be worked out by applying the notifications available during the relevant period. It further corrected paragraph 4(g) to state that goods falling under Chapter 68 and using more than 25% by weight of specified materials were fully exempt under Notification No. 08/96-C.E., that the exemption under Notification No. 5/97-C.E. was restricted to 8%, and that under Notification No. 5/98-C.E. the exemption was restricted to goods falling under heading 6807.10.
Conclusion: The earlier order was amended and substituted to reflect the correct notification position, and the Revenue's rectification application succeeded.