Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was admissible on solution vessels and cylindrical vertical tanks, membrane modules used for processing chemicals, primary nickel cathodes, and cable trays.
Analysis: The contested items were examined in the context of their use in the manufacturing process. The solution vessel and cylindrical vertical tank were treated as eligible capital goods in view of the Tribunal's earlier view on similar items. The membrane modules were found to fall within the scope of the explanation to Rule 57Q, including goods classifiable under heading 84.21, and were used for filtering chemicals in manufacture. Primary nickel cathodes were accepted as being used in the reaction process in manufacture. Cable trays were covered by the Supreme Court's ruling in Jawahar Mills, which recognised their admissibility as capital goods.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on all the disputed items and the denial of credit was not sustainable.