Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods used in the manufacture of glass shells were capital goods eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The use of each item, as recorded in the lower appellate order, was not disputed. The recorded use established a nexus with the manufacture of the final product in the respondent's factory. In any event, the definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q was held to be wide, and eligibility depended upon the user of the goods rather than a strict nexus test. As the use of the goods was admitted and connected with the manufacturing process, the items satisfied the requirement for capital goods credit.
Conclusion: The goods were held eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q, so the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Eligibility to Modvat credit under Rule 57Q turns on the user of the goods in the manufacturing process, and a direct nexus with the final product is not a controlling test where such use is established.