Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether market fee under section 19 of the M.P. Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1972 is leviable on notified agricultural produce brought into the market area for use in manufacture, where the produce is not used for processing in the statutory sense.
Analysis: Section 19 levies market fee on notified agricultural produce brought into the market area and used for processing. The statutory definition of "processing" in section 2(mmm) contemplates treatment to which agricultural produce is subjected before final consumption. The distinction between processing and manufacture is material: manufacture involves emergence of a commercially distinct new commodity, while processing may involve treatment or a series of operations without necessarily creating a new commercial article. On the plain wording of section 19(1)(ii), both elements must coexist, namely bringing the produce into the market area and its use for processing. The provision cannot be extended merely because the produce is used as a raw material in manufacturing.
Conclusion: Market fee is not leviable where the notified agricultural produce is brought into the market area for use as raw material in manufacture and not for processing as required by section 19(1)(ii). The appellant succeeds.
Ratio Decidendi: Liability under the levy provision arises only when the notified agricultural produce is both brought into the market area and used for processing; use in manufacture, without statutory processing, does not attract market fee.