Modvat credit admissibility upheld for explosives and welding electrodes where binding precedent squarely applied.

Restoration of the appeal was justified because the duty demand had already been discharged by reversal of credit, so the earlier non-compliance basis no longer survived. On the Modvat issues, credit on explosives was admissible as the point was covered by binding Supreme Court authority, and credit on welding electrodes was likewise admissible because the issue was covered by a Larger Bench decision and a Supreme Court ruling. The result was restoration of the appeal and acceptance of both credit claims, with the governing principle that Modvat credit cannot be denied where binding precedent squarely supports admissibility.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the appeal deserved restoration after deposit of the duty amount by reversal of credit; (ii) Whether Modvat credit was admissible on explosives; (iii) Whether Modvat credit was admissible on welding electrodes.

Issue (i): Restoration of the appeal was sought on the footing that the entire duty amount had been discharged by reversing the credit, though the fact was furnished belatedly.

Analysis: The record showed payment of the full duty amount by reversal of credit. In view of this factual position, the basis for non-compliance no longer survived.

Conclusion: The restoration application was allowed and the appeal was restored.

Issue (ii): Whether Modvat credit on explosives was admissible.

Analysis: The question was held to be covered by binding Supreme Court authority recognising admissibility of such credit.

Conclusion: Modvat credit on explosives was held admissible.

Issue (iii): Whether Modvat credit on welding electrodes was admissible.

Analysis: The question was held to be covered by the Larger Bench decision and the Supreme Court decision on the same point.

Conclusion: Modvat credit on welding electrodes was held admissible.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on the merits and the appellant obtained restoration of the appeal together with relief on both Modvat credit issues.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the disputed entitlement to Modvat credit is squarely governed by binding precedent, the credit cannot be denied.

---