Modvat credit on computer systems fails where the equipment is not shown to be used in manufacture.

Computer systems were not treated as capital goods eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q because they were not shown to be used in the manufacture of excisable goods or to form part of the manufacturing line. Their use for production planning, monitoring, design, drafting and sketching was regarded as incidental rather than constituting direct manufacturing use. The later exclusion of Chapter 8471 was treated as clarificatory of the earlier position, and the broader Bench ruling relied on by the assessee was distinguished on the basis that the factual finding here remained that the system was not used for manufacture. Credit disallowance was therefore upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether a computer system was eligible as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Analysis: The credit claim was examined against the requirement that the item must answer the description of capital goods used in relation to manufacture. The record showed that the computer system was not used in bringing about any change in the substance of the product and was not established to be part of the manufacturing line. The plea that it was used for production planning, monitoring, design, drafting and sketching was treated as incidental rather than the primary manufacturing use. The subsequent exclusion of Chapter 8471 was also viewed as clarificatory of the earlier position. The larger Bench decision relied upon by the appellant was distinguished on the footing that the factual finding here remained that the computer system was not used for manufacture.

Conclusion: Computer systems were held not to qualify for Modvat credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q, and the disallowance of credit was upheld.

---