Company investigation powers under Section 237: Court declined discretion where the Company Law Board had statutory authority.

Section 237(a)(ii) of the Companies Act, 1956 was treated as a discretionary court power to seek investigation into a company's affairs, but the amended Section 237(b) vested the power to order investigation in the Company Law Board. On allegations of improper accounts, unauthorised business activities and mismanagement, the Court declined to exercise its own discretion because an alternative statutory forum was available for the same relief. The request for a declaration directing investigation by the Central Government was therefore refused, leaving the petitioner free to proceed under Section 237(b).

---

---

Issues: Whether the Court should declare that the affairs of the company required investigation under Section 237(a)(ii) of the Companies Act, 1956, despite the statutory power of the Company Law Board under Section 237(b).

Analysis: The petition invoked the Court's discretionary power to seek an order for investigation into the company's affairs on allegations of improper accounts, unauthorised business activities, and mismanagement. The legal framework recognised that while the Court had power under Section 237(a)(ii), Section 237(b), as amended, vested the power to order investigation in the Company Law Board. In that setting, the Court found no reason to exercise its own discretionary power when the petitioner had an available statutory forum to seek the same relief.

Conclusion: The request for a declaration directing investigation by the Central Government was declined, and the petition was dismissed, leaving the petitioner free to approach the Company Law Board under Section 237(b).

---