Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the chemical preparations used captively in processing cinematographic films and the spent hypo-solutions used in the silver-extraction process were excisable goods liable to central excise duty.
Analysis: The demand failed because the department did not establish that the chemical preparations had the requisite marketability. Their short shelf-life, by itself, was insufficient to prove that they could be marketed under normal conditions, and evidence from other laboratories was not shown to relate to the same formulations or conditions. The same defect affected the case on spent hypo-solutions. The finding that those solutions were not sold but recycled, and that the product remained the same before and after silver extraction, was not displaced by the department's evidence. In such circumstances, the essential requirement of marketability was not proved, and the onus resting on the department was not discharged.
Conclusion: The chemical preparations and spent hypo-solutions were not excisable, and the duty demand was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: An intermediate product captively consumed is not excisable unless the department proves that it is marketable in fact and has sufficient shelf-life or other characteristics enabling sale in the market.