Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether hypo-solution was marketable excisable goods chargeable to duty under Heading 3707, and whether the benefit of Notification No. 217/86-C.E. was available.
Analysis: The decisive requirement for excisability is that the product must be marketable as goods. The material on record supported the finding that the hypo-solution was prepared for immediate use, had a very short shelf life, and was not shown to be a commodity capable of being bought and sold in the market. The departmental reliance on the chemical composition of the product and the Chief Chemist's opinion did not displace the finding on non-marketability. In the absence of evidence establishing marketability, the product could not be treated as excisable goods merely because it was a specially formulated solution.
Conclusion: Hypo-solution was not excisable goods under Heading 3707, and the assessee's case succeeded on the issue of dutiability.
Final Conclusion: The appeals failed and the orders holding the product non-dutiable were left undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Marketability is an essential condition for excisability, and a product prepared for instant use with no established marketability cannot be treated as excisable goods merely because of its composition.