Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the terms of the consent reference and the partnership deed, the arbitrator had jurisdiction to entertain and decide the counter-claim seeking dissolution of the partnership firm.
Analysis: The dispute was referred to sole arbitration broadly in relation to the parties' rights and obligations arising out of the agreement, the retirement deed, the use of trade marks, and the determination of the first respondent's rights as a partner. The partnership deed itself contemplated reference of all disputes and questions in connection with the partnership to arbitration, and the Court held that the reference was not to be read narrowly so as to exclude a claim for dissolution. It was further held that a partner's claim for dissolution can arise from the same relationship and dispute matrix that gave rise to the original suit, and the existence of strained relations and breakdown of mutual trust and confidence could support such a claim. The Court also held that there is no rule of law barring an arbitrator from deciding whether a partnership should be dissolved where the reference is wide enough to cover all disputes between the partners.
Conclusion: The arbitrator had jurisdiction to consider the counter-claim for dissolution of the partnership, and the challenge to the High Court's view failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the arbitration clause or reference is wide enough to submit all disputes between partners, the arbitrator may decide a claim for dissolution of the partnership, including disputes based on breakdown of mutual trust and confidence.