Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the production aids used in or in relation to the manufacture of printing machinery and parts thereof were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 217/86, and whether the appeal was governed by the earlier Tribunal decision on the same issue.
Analysis: The appellants claimed that the disputed items were used as aids in the manufacture of their final products and therefore fell within the scope of the exemption notification and the input concept under Rule 57A. The Tribunal noted that the issue had already been considered and covered by its earlier decision in the cited precedent. Following that view, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's contention.
Conclusion: The exemption claim was accepted and the appeal succeeded in favour of the assessee.