Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty order was sustainable when the adjudication proceeded on specimen documents and not on the actual agreements and correspondence relating to each public issue, and whether the matter required remand for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The rules and regulations governing bankers to an issue were held to be mandatory subordinate legislation having the force of law, and non-compliance could attract penalty. An agreement could also arise from exchanged correspondence if the parties were ad idem, but compliance with regulation 14 had to be examined from the actual documents relevant to each issue. The adjudication proceeded largely on specimen materials and did not record specific findings issue-wise on whether the required particulars were in fact contained in the operative documents, whether the collection centres were approved and circulated as required, and whether the agent of the issuer was duly authorised to bind the principal.
Conclusion: The penalty order was set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication.
Final Conclusion: The adjudication was found to require a fresh, issue-specific examination of the actual documents before any final penal determination could be made.
Ratio Decidendi: Where statutory compliance depends on issue-specific contractual documents, adjudication cannot rest on specimen papers or presumptions and must be based on the actual operative records with specific findings on each charge.