Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the company should be ordered to be wound up under section 433(a) of the Companies Act, 1956 on the ground of indebtedness, closure of business, and absence of prospects of revival.
Analysis: The petition was supported by averments that the company had become heavily indebted, its business had come to a standstill, its offices were closed, and there was no prospect of revival. These assertions were not seriously controverted in the counter-affidavit. On the material before it, the Court found that the statutory basis for winding up was made out, and accepted that the public-interest consideration did not preclude such relief on the facts presented.
Conclusion: The company was liable to be wound up and the petition was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the facts show that a company has become heavily indebted, has closed its business, and there is no prospect of revival, a winding-up order may be made under section 433(a) of the Companies Act, 1956.