TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal rejected for Modvat credit due to lack of prior sanction under Rule 57G.</h1> <h3>JS. PLASTIC & LEATHERWEAR Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KANPUR</h3> The appeal was rejected by the Tribunal as the appellant failed to obtain prior sanction from the Assistant Commissioner as required by Rule 57G for ... Modvat/Cenvat - Duty paying documents The appeal was filed against the denial of Modvat credit to the appellant by the Commissioner (Appeals) following a decision of the Tribunal's Larger Bench. The appellant took credit without obtaining prior sanction from the Assistant Commissioner as required by Rule 57G. The Tribunal upheld the denial of credit, stating that the mandatory requirement under Rule 57G had not been fulfilled in this case. The appeal was rejected.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
