Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disputed items were eligible for capital goods Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q was treated as wide and liberal. Items such as components, accessories, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools, appliances, and generating sets qualified where they were used for producing or processing goods, or were otherwise used in the factory in connection with manufacture. The Court applied the principle that the decisive inquiry is the functional use of the item in the manufacturing process or in relation to manufacture, and accepted that the items in dispute were used at preparatory, intermediate, or pollution-control stages connected with cement manufacture. The earlier ruling on cables and wires was treated as laying down the governing test, and the same reasoning was held applicable to the present items.
Conclusion: The disputed items were held eligible for capital goods Modvat credit, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A provision defining capital goods in liberal terms must be construed functionally, and any item used in producing, processing, or otherwise in relation to manufacture, including components and accessories used for that purpose, qualifies for Modvat credit.