Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disputed items, other than the item withdrawn as not pressed, were eligible capital goods for availing Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The claim regarding plain sheets, chequered plates and similar items was not pressed and therefore stood withdrawn. For the remaining items, the existing legal position had to be reconsidered in the light of later case law, including the principles stated by the Supreme Court in Jawahar Mills. The determining question was whether the goods qualified as capital goods and whether they were used in the process of, or in relation to, the manufacture of the finished products. As the issue required fresh factual and legal examination by the adjudicating authority, the matter was sent back for reconsideration.
Conclusion: The dispute concerning the remaining items was remanded to the original authority for fresh adjudication in accordance with law, after giving the appellant an opportunity to substantiate the claim.