Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the accused petitioners were entitled to exemption from personal appearance under section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and permission to appear through counsel in proceedings arising from alleged offences under the Income-tax Act.
Analysis: Section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 confers a discretionary power on the Magistrate to dispense with the personal attendance of an accused when summons is issued, and the accused may seek that relief through counsel without first appearing in person. The discretion is to be exercised on the nature of the offence, the conduct of the accused, and the inconvenience caused by personal attendance, and is ordinarily not granted in serious offences or those involving moral turpitude. On the facts, the allegations concerned failure to deduct or deposit tax and did not disclose personal misappropriation or defalcation. The petitioners also held responsible posts and their regular personal appearance would cause inconvenience.
Conclusion: The petitioners were entitled to exemption from personal appearance and to be represented through counsel, subject to the court requiring their presence at any stage of trial if necessary.
Final Conclusion: The refusal to grant exemption from appearance was unsustainable, and the petitions succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: In appropriate summons cases, personal appearance may be dispensed with under section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 where the offence is not serious or involving moral turpitude and the circumstances justify representation through counsel.