Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether aluminium and wooden patterns manufactured in the respondent's factory were entitled to exemption from central excise duty and, therefore, whether the departmental demand was sustainable.
Analysis: The exemption claim was examined with reference to the notifications relied upon by the respondent, including the notifications applicable to patterns manufactured in the factory and used within the factory or in another factory of the same manufacturer. The record showed that the patterns were manufactured in the respondent's premises and thereafter used for obtaining castings required for the machines manufactured by them. In that factual and legal setting, no basis was found to deny the exemption or to sustain the proposed duty demand.
Conclusion: The aluminium and wooden patterns were held to be covered by the exemption, and the departmental demand was rejected.