<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 686 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103530</link>
    <description>Aluminium and wooden patterns manufactured in the factory and used to obtain castings for machines made by the same manufacturer fell within the exemption notifications covering patterns used within the factory or in another factory of the same manufacturer; on that basis, no ground existed to deny central excise exemption, and the departmental duty demand was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:14:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 686 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103530</link>
      <description>Aluminium and wooden patterns manufactured in the factory and used to obtain castings for machines made by the same manufacturer fell within the exemption notifications covering patterns used within the factory or in another factory of the same manufacturer; on that basis, no ground existed to deny central excise exemption, and the departmental duty demand was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>