Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 287/86-C.E., dated 05.05.1986 in respect of their products described as speciality oils manufactured by blending two mineral oils.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that both sides agreed that the issue was covered by its earlier decision, under which the Revenue's appeal had already been rejected on the same question. In view of that binding earlier view, the impugned order could not be sustained against the appellants.
Conclusion: The benefit of the notification was held admissible to the appellants, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
Final Conclusion: The decision granted exemption-related relief to the assessee by following the Tribunal's earlier ruling on the same issue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the very issue is covered by a prior Tribunal decision in favour of the assessee, the exemption claim under the notification is to be accepted and the adverse order set aside.