<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 784 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103518</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 287/86-C.E. was available for speciality oils manufactured by blending two mineral oils, because the Tribunal treated the issue as already covered by its earlier decision in favour of the assessee. Applying that prior view, the adverse order could not be sustained and the notification benefit was accepted. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:43:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 784 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103518</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 287/86-C.E. was available for speciality oils manufactured by blending two mineral oils, because the Tribunal treated the issue as already covered by its earlier decision in favour of the assessee. Applying that prior view, the adverse order could not be sustained and the notification benefit was accepted. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>