Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Scheme of Arrangement between the transferor company and the transferee company deserved sanction and, if so, whether the transfer of the Lohpohia Tea Estate with its assets, liabilities and pending proceedings should take effect in favour of the transferee company.
Analysis: The requisite shareholder meetings had been duly held and the reports placed before the Court under Rule 78 of the Companies (Courts) Rules, 1959. Notice had been served on the Regional Director and the Company Law Board, and public notice of the hearing had also been published as directed. The Regional Director raised no objection to approval of the scheme. The Court found the arrangement to be bona fide and saw no legal impediment to granting sanction. The scheme expressly provided for transfer and vesting of the undertaking, liabilities and pending proceedings of the Lohpohia Tea Estate in the transferee company with effect from the appointed date, in terms of section 394(2) of the Companies Act, 1956.
Conclusion: The Scheme of Arrangement was sanctioned, and the transfer and vesting provisions became binding on the companies, their shareholders and all concerned.