Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disputed machinery items were eligible as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The items were found to be used in or in relation to the manufacture of cotton yarn and, without them, the final product could not be manufactured. They were treated as part of the textile machinery. The principle applied was that equipment necessary for the functioning of the plant and linked to manufacture falls within the scope of capital goods.
Conclusion: The machinery items were eligible for Modvat credit and the Revenue appeal was rejected.