Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported automatic data processing systems, imported along with a vacuum emission spectrometer and an engine development system respectively, were classifiable under Heading 84.71 as units of an automatic data processing system or under the headings applicable to the spectrometer and engine development system.
Analysis: The imported computer in each case was used independently of the other item. No material showed that the spectrometer or engine development system could not function without the computer, or that the computer was integral to the specific function of the other machine. In such circumstances, Note 4 to Section XVI, which applies the specific-function principle to combinations of machines, did not assist the appellant because the items were not shown to form an inseparable functional combination. The classification adopted by the lower authorities under Heading 84.71 was therefore not displaced.
Conclusion: The classification under Heading 84.71 as an automatic data processing system was upheld and the challenge to the departmental classification failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were rejected because the imported computer equipment was treated as independently classifiable as an automatic data processing system and not as part of the other imported machines.