<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 446 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101968</link>
    <description>Imported automatic data processing systems were treated as independently classifiable under Heading 84.71 rather than as parts of a vacuum emission spectrometer or an engine development system. The relevant Note 4 to Section XVI did not apply because the materials did not show an inseparable functional combination: each computer operated independently, and there was no evidence that either machine could not function without it or that the computer performed an integral specific function within the other equipment. On that basis, the departmental classification under Heading 84.71 was upheld and the challenge to it failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:00:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 446 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101968</link>
      <description>Imported automatic data processing systems were treated as independently classifiable under Heading 84.71 rather than as parts of a vacuum emission spectrometer or an engine development system. The relevant Note 4 to Section XVI did not apply because the materials did not show an inseparable functional combination: each computer operated independently, and there was no evidence that either machine could not function without it or that the computer performed an integral specific function within the other equipment. On that basis, the departmental classification under Heading 84.71 was upheld and the challenge to it failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>