Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a winding-up petition based on the deeming fiction of inability to pay debts could be sustained when the statutory demand notice under section 434 was not delivered at the company's registered office, and whether rule 33 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 could cure that defect.
Analysis: The statutory fiction under section 434 arises only if the creditor serves a demand by causing it to be delivered at the registered office of the company. The provision permits flexibility only as to the mode of service by registered post or otherwise, but not as to the place of delivery. Rule 33 is confined to defects or irregularities in service under the Companies (Court) Rules and cannot override the mandatory requirement embedded in section 434. Since the petition rested solely on the deemed inability to pay debts and did not plead sufficient particulars of actual inability to pay, the absence of valid service at the registered office meant that the statutory fiction was not available.
Conclusion: The defect was fatal to the winding-up petition. The demand notice not having been served at the registered office, the petition could not be sustained on the statutory deeming fiction, and the appellant succeeded.