Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the overhead conveyor system erected in the factory from duty-paid bought-out components constituted goods liable to central excise duty.
Analysis: The conveyor system was assembled and erected at site from purchased duty-paid parts and was embedded to the earth. A system so erected, incapable of being moved to another place without dismantling, acquires the character of immovable property. Since central excise is leviable only on goods and not on immovable property, such a conveyor system fails the test of marketability and does not amount to goods for the purpose of levy. The view was supported by the cited decisions on site-erected conveyor systems and other erected machinery.
Conclusion: The overhead conveyor system was not excisable goods and no central excise duty was payable on it.