<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 339 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101775</link>
    <description>An overhead conveyor system assembled and erected in the factory from duty-paid bought-out components, and embedded to the earth, was treated as immovable property because it could not be moved without dismantling. Central excise is leviable only on goods, so the system failed the test of marketability and did not qualify as excisable goods. No central excise duty was payable on the site-erected conveyor system.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:00:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 339 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101775</link>
      <description>An overhead conveyor system assembled and erected in the factory from duty-paid bought-out components, and embedded to the earth, was treated as immovable property because it could not be moved without dismantling. Central excise is leviable only on goods, so the system failed the test of marketability and did not qualify as excisable goods. No central excise duty was payable on the site-erected conveyor system.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>